Re: offeredBy to supersede vendor, merchant, provider, seller, ...?

Yes, that will be fixed in GoodRelations in the next service update.

Best wishes / Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Martin Hepp

martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: (group) (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
* Project Main Page:

On 03 Jun 2014, at 19:54, Thad Guidry <> wrote:

> I meant that the phrasing would be more clear by saying... an offering represents the public announcement, not necessarily binding,...etc.
> On Jun 3, 2014 10:12 AM, "Simon Spero" <> wrote:
> Ask your corporate counsel office about offer and acceptance, duration of power of acceptance, revocation, goods vs. services, etc.  
> They should be able to explain why the semantics are so limited.
> On Jun 3, 2014 9:48 AM, "Thad Guidry" <> wrote:
> Why do folks write like that ?  ... splitting the concept of "public announcement" ... no wonder search engines have such a tough time. :)
> "An offering represents the public, not necessarily binding, not necessarily exclusive, announcement by a gr:BusinessEntity to provide (or seek) a certain gr:BusinessFunction for 
> -- 
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry
> Thad on LinkedIn

Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 21:42:58 UTC