- From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:42:27 +0200
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Yes, that will be fixed in GoodRelations in the next service update.
Best wishes / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Martin Hepp
-------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: martin.hepp@unibw.de
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
On 03 Jun 2014, at 19:54, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
> I meant that the phrasing would be more clear by saying... an offering represents the public announcement, not necessarily binding,...etc.
> On Jun 3, 2014 10:12 AM, "Simon Spero" <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ask your corporate counsel office about offer and acceptance, duration of power of acceptance, revocation, goods vs. services, etc.
> They should be able to explain why the semantics are so limited.
>
> On Jun 3, 2014 9:48 AM, "Thad Guidry" <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why do folks write like that ? ... splitting the concept of "public announcement" ... no wonder search engines have such a tough time. :)
>
>
> "An offering represents the public, not necessarily binding, not necessarily exclusive, announcement by a gr:BusinessEntity to provide (or seek) a certain gr:BusinessFunction for
>
> --
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry
> Thad on LinkedIn
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 21:42:58 UTC