- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:54:23 -0500
- To: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 17:54:50 UTC
I meant that the phrasing would be more clear by saying... an offering represents the public announcement, not necessarily binding,...etc. On Jun 3, 2014 10:12 AM, "Simon Spero" <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote: > Ask your corporate counsel office about offer and acceptance, duration of > power of acceptance, revocation, goods vs. services, etc. > They should be able to explain why the semantics are so limited. > On Jun 3, 2014 9:48 AM, "Thad Guidry" <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why do folks write like that ? ... splitting the concept of "public >> announcement" ... no wonder search engines have such a tough time. :) >> >> >>> "An offering represents the public, not necessarily binding, not >>> necessarily exclusive, announcement by a gr:BusinessEntity to provide (or >>> seek) a certain gr:BusinessFunction for >> >> >> -- >> -Thad >> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 17:54:50 UTC