Re: offeredBy to supersede vendor, merchant, provider, seller, ?

The definition of gr:Offering/offer being different from the formal notion of binding offers in most legislations was a design decision in GoodRelations, because offers in most Web shops are not offers in the legal sense, and it was important to have a wording in place that does not turn them into legally binding offers. I agree that the wording can be improved. I will handle that in the next GR service release.

Martin
-------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  martin.hepp@unibw.de
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/




On 03 Jun 2014, at 15:48, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why do folks write like that ?  ... splitting the concept of "public announcement" ... no wonder search engines have such a tough time. :)
> 
> 
> "An offering represents the public, not necessarily binding, not necessarily exclusive, announcement by a gr:BusinessEntity to provide (or seek) a certain gr:BusinessFunction for 
> 
> -- 
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry
> Thad on LinkedIn

Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 17:10:53 UTC