- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:31:05 +0000
- To: François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@lirmm.fr>
- Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 28 January 2014 21:16, François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@lirmm.fr> wrote: > Thank you Thad, I will try that. > > ... which actually lead me to a more general question: I understand that > schema.org functions more like a standardization body while Freebase schemas > are edited by the community more in a Wikipedia fashion. This results in > schema.org being cleaner, having less redundancy, and usually there is only > one way to model one thing. Now if I project myself in a close future I can > see that my radio station will publish its info on its own website using > schema.org. That data will be harvested by crawlers and then get back to the > public, maybe automatically written to Freebase or Wikidata. If this > scenario makes sense schema.org and Freebase schemas will slowly converge, > or said differently schema.org will evolve to be able cover all the domains > in Freebase. Is it a plausible scenario ? I won't comment on specific product plans at Google, but broadly I think these are not too far fetched as possible scenarios. Schema.org will continue to evolve, and there is plenty to learn from Freebase but any schema convergence would best happen here, organically via community discussion. Regarding schema.org scope, when Freebase was created, Wikidata didn't exist. Thanks to Freebase, DBpedia, Semantic mediawiki and other initiatives showing the way, the larger Wikipedia community is starting to engage with structured data. My hope is that in some way we'll all "meet in the middle". It is not plausible for schema.org to have types to cover everything. As an example, http://schema.org/PlaceOfWorship has six subtypes for a few well known religions, but leaving many missing. I hope as Wikidata matures, it will cover more of the longer tail for such things, perhaps often grounded in more general types defined at schema.org. Dan > François > > Le 28/01/2014 15:33, Thad Guidry a écrit : >> >> And I spent some time on filling out some properties on this Radio Station >> for you last week... to show how Broadcast Content is used in our Freebase >> schema, in regards to a Radio Station that happens to air such content... >> like the weekend Latin Jazz radio program in Los Angeles called "Alma del >> Barrio" : >> >> https://www.freebase.com/m/0489gl >> >> Forgot to come back to this post and reply to you, François. >> >> All the best, >> -- >> -Thad >> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com >> <mailto:danbri@google.com>> wrote: >> >> On 16 January 2014 17:06, François Scharffe >> <francois.scharffe@lirmm.fr <mailto:francois.scharffe@lirmm.fr>> >> >> wrote: >> > All right, thanks Yves, I'm looking forward to this extension. >> > >> > François >> > >> > Le 15/01/2014 17:01, Yves Raimond a écrit : >> >> >> >> Ah that's really interesting - we were just thinking of writing an >> >> extension to PO for that, and submitting to schema.org >> <http://schema.org> later :) There's >> >> >> quite a few edge cases for describing radio stations (regional >> >> variations, service opt-outs, simulcasts etc.) which are quite >> tricky >> >> though, so not straight-fw >> >> Also worth checking out, the design (& data) in Freebase: >> http://www.freebase.com/broadcast?schema= >> >> cheers, >> >> Dan >> >> >> y >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 16:38 -0500, François Scharffe wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hello everyone, >> >>> >> >>> I would like to describe a radio station, its broadcasting >> type, and the >> >>> list of frequencies for each area in which it is broadcasted. >> >>> There is the RadioStation class but it doesn't seem possible >> to express >> >>> what I want to using schema.org <http://schema.org>. >> >> >>> Ideally it would look like: >> >>> >> >>> { "@id": "http://www.fipradio.fr/", >> >>> "@type": "RadioStation", >> >>> "name": "FIP", >> >>> "broadcastingType": "FM", >> >>> "radioFrequency": >> >>> [ {"location": "Paris", "frequency": " 105.1" }, >> >>> {"location": "Toulouse", "frequency": "103.5" }, >> >>> ... ] >> >>> } >> >>> >> >>> Any idea ? >> >>> >> >>> François >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----------------------------- >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk >> >> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and >> >> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC >> unless >> >> specifically stated. >> >> If you have received it in >> >> error, please delete it from your system. >> >> Do not use, copy or disclose the >> >> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the >> sender >> >> immediately. >> >> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails >> >> sent or received. >> >> Further communication will signify your consent to >> >> this. >> >> ----------------------------- >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 21:31:33 UTC