I agree that updating the core textual definitions so that any question-answer information plus its associated social context could be marked up would be a great improvement, in particular wrt conversational queries in web search engines. So clearly: +1 --------------------------------------- martin hepp www: http://www.heppnetz.de/ email: mhepp@computer.org > On 25.01.2014, at 21:01, Shawn Simister <simister@google.com> wrote: > > Would this be the right schema for marking up an FAQ page on a static website? Every question would have a single accepted answer. However, it doesn't quite fit the description of "a user is seeking an answer from a community of experts" since the questions and answers are all written by the owner of the website. > > >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> Thanks to Stéphane Corlosquet for taking a lead on this - we have a >> draft schema design for "question and answer" sites. See >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/7befd20efb66/schema.org/ext/QA.html >> for the raw schema, http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/QASchemaResearch >> for background notes and comparison with Stack Overflow's datamodel. >> >> I've posted a temporary test build here: >> >> http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/Question >> http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/Answer >> >> It re-uses a lot of existing stuff, so the main additions are to make >> explicit the notion of kinds of CreativeWork representing questions or >> answers, as well as the various counts that often appear (upvotes, >> downvotes etc.). >> >> Comments / discussion as always welcomed here or in the WebSchemas Wiki. >> >> cheers, >> >> Dan > > > > -- > Shawn Simister > > Knowledge Developer Relations > Google
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 22:38:19 UTC