W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > January 2014

RE: Finalizing Reservation schemas for schema.org

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:20:32 +0100
To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@google.com>, "'W3C Web Schemas Task Force'" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Cc: "'Vicki Tardif Holland'" <vtardif@google.com>
Message-ID: <006201cf1941$bc541770$34fc4650$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:38 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> Many thanks to Vicki for working through all the fine-grained detail
> for finalizing the Reservation vocabulary, which was circulated here a
> while back. This version reflects all feedback, and in particular
> pulls several pieces of ticketing-related information into a dedicated
> Ticket type.
> Here's the RDFS:
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/6910d4e4591a/schema.org/ext/Reser
> vation.html
> Wiki: https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/ReservationsSchema (not up to
> date, like much of wiki currently)
> A test build is here:
> http://sdo-wip2.appspot.com/Reservation
> http://sdo-wip2.appspot.com/Ticket etc.

Nice! Just some minor questions:

Ticket has a downloadUrl whereas Reservation doesn't. Wouldn't it in both cases make sense to just use Thing's url property instead? If not, what would you use url for in these cases?

Is it really necessary to have cancelReservationUrl, confirmReservationUrl, and modifyReservationUrl on Reservation? Do you expect them to point to different URLs in practice? I would expect that in most cases all three (or at least two of them) would point to a single page which allows you to cancel/confirm or modify your reservation.

Markus Lanthaler
Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 20:21:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:21 UTC