- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:57:57 +0000
- To: Guha <guha@google.com>
- Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Shawn Simister <simister@google.com>, elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
OK, Stephane and I just got together to review the feedback and discussion collected so far, here and anecdotally elsewhere. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Jan/0200.html was my earlier summary of threads, and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Jan/0107.html the original draft schema + test site. The updated RDFS is in the W3C repo as usual, https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/log/default/schema.org/ext/QA.html See 'diff' link there for details. Overview: we now cover FAQs, have a QAPage type for the subtype of WebPage that includes questions and answers, and accepted various tweaks and fixes from the thread. We also include a long-overdue fix to the 'comment' property, whose values can now be of type Comment (rather than the older UserComments type which I'd consider a candidate for deprecation). Test site is at this (transient etc) URL: http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/Question http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/Answer http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/QAPage http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/comment I have to say I'm not totally convinced by http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/parentItem but overall I think we're pretty close. Stephane is working on an example, but other examples would be great. Dan
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 17:58:25 UTC