- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 13:49:32 +0100
- To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@google.com>, "'Guha'" <guha@google.com>
- Cc: "'Karen Coyle'" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "'Thad Guidry'" <thadguidry@gmail.com>, "'Shawn Simister'" <simister@google.com>, "'elf Pavlik'" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, "'Martin Hepp'" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, 'Stéphane Corlosquet' <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, "'W3C Web Schemas Task Force'" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 6:58 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > OK, Stephane and I just got together to review the feedback and > discussion collected so far, here and anecdotally elsewhere. > [...] > > The updated RDFS is in the W3C repo as usual, > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/log/default/schema.org/ext/QA.html How do you link from a QAPage to its questions/answers? mainContentOfPage's range is WebPageElement... [...] > I have to say I'm not totally convinced by > http://sdo-wip1.appspot.com/parentItem but overall I think we're Neither am I. If it is really necessary, it's domain and range should at least be changed to CreativeWork (perhaps even Thing). But I think it should better be left out till its use cases become clearer. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Sunday, 9 February 2014 12:50:11 UTC