- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 17:48:41 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Apr 4, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > On 4 April 2014 22:05, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> On 4/4/14 8:49 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> >>> The bad news is only temporary: There are a few glitches that we're >>> working to fix asap. >> >> Dan, >> >> Please look at [1]. I don't know if this is a glitch or intentional. > > Thanks. I think you're the first person to have shown interest in the > RDFa+RDFS that we used to have in per-term pages. It's on the list of > things to add back in, but there are some other things that need to > get done first. > > Note that the entire schema is available at > http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html -> > http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html > > Do you have some particular use in mind for in-page schema > declarations, or it's just appealing for general Linked Data usage? For me, I would think that each term might reference the vocabulary document somehow (perhaps rel=describedBy?). It would also be useful if going to http://schema.org/ would somehow allow discovery of the vocabulary. Perhaps when you get a JSON-LD context there (through content-negotiation), it could also include the JSON-LD serialization of the RDFS definition? Alternatively, link to it through a suitable relationship. The Structured Data linter [1] (among other tools) makes use of the RDFa+RDFS to perform basic validation services. Right now, I have to build in a special case to fetch the vocabulary from http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html; it would be nice if that could simply be discovered. (By the way, I've updated the linter to use the updated vocabulary. I expect to update the examples used in the linter to be based on [2] (with attribution). This seems like the best source for those examples; correct me if I've got it wrong, though, please. Gregg [1] http://linter.structured-data.org/ [2] https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/blob/master/data/examples.txt > Dan > >> [1] >> http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FVehicle >> -- Note: the object of the rdfs:subClassOf relation is a literal rather than >> a URI >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Kingsley Idehen >> Founder & CEO >> OpenLink Software >> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen >> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about >> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 5 April 2014 00:49:12 UTC