Re: Tracing Hieritage

Some of the Recipe schema was modeled from
https://www.freebase.com/m/05v2c_w

and a few slices from BBC recipes
http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/recipes/beef_tacos_with_salsa_67130  :)


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> On 26 August 2013 21:26, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious as to where specific classes or properties have come from.  I
>> was looking at:
>>
>>    http://www.schema.org/NutritionInformation
>>
>> which is traceable to the 'nutrition' property of 'Recipe' and so the
>> 'Recipe' class came from where?
>>
>> That is, I'm trying to understand those classes and properties there were
>> adapted from other existing vocabularies versus those that are "newly"
>> created.
>>
>
> Every type page for a type that was added via a collaboration should show
> some acknowledgement of an external source. That includes the medical
> vocabulary we added
> http://blog.schema.org/2012/06/health-and-medical-vocabulary-for.html
>
> For example, http://www.schema.org/Muscle says 'This class contains
> information contributed by WikiDoc <http://wikidoc.org/>.'
>
> This information is available in RDFa as part of the dump at
> http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html ... but we've not yet added
> it to the per-property pages.
>
> If no external contribution is mentioned, then the vocabulary was part of
> the original release in June 2011.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Dan
>



-- 
-Thad
Thad on Freebase.com <http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry>
Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>