W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Tracing Hieritage

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:51:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFqn7Tkjg3Sna6s9vCiD_d52qwzoA=QwuU+JKCtox=FcJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 26 August 2013 21:26, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:

> I'm curious as to where specific classes or properties have come from.  I
> was looking at:
>    http://www.schema.org/NutritionInformation
> which is traceable to the 'nutrition' property of 'Recipe' and so the
> 'Recipe' class came from where?
> That is, I'm trying to understand those classes and properties there were
> adapted from other existing vocabularies versus those that are "newly"
> created.

Every type page for a type that was added via a collaboration should show
some acknowledgement of an external source. That includes the medical
vocabulary we added

For example, http://www.schema.org/Muscle says 'This class contains
information contributed by WikiDoc <http://wikidoc.org/>.'

This information is available in RDFa as part of the dump at
http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html ... but we've not yet added it
to the per-property pages.

If no external contribution is mentioned, then the vocabulary was part of
the original release in June 2011.

Hope this helps,

Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 22:51:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:02 UTC