Dan, Can you spell out exactly with an example, "what is appealing" ? Lost in translation I'm afraid. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > > > > On 14 August 2013 16:17, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Quick feedback Omar and others, >> >> <table typeof="Painting" vocab="http://schema.org/"> >> >> I would rather see "typeof" be renamed to "rowstypeof" or simply >> "rowstype" to truly indicate that all the rows themselves have the implied >> type and not the Table Set type or class. This way we can reserve the >> Table "typeof" for higher kinded types, classes, and categories if need be ? >> >> My thinking and expression would look something like this : >> >> <table typeof="Artwork" rowstype="Painting" vocab="http://schema.org/"> >> >> cooler ideas also embedding the use of http://schema.org/Class : >> >> <table category="OnSale" class="Artwork" rowstype="Painting" vocab=" >> http://schema.org/"> >> >> Thoughts ? >> > > This would mean changes/additions to RDFa. And then we'd have to figure > out the equivalent in JSON-LD, Microdata etc etc. So it is appealing to do > the modeling as a pure vocabulary, rather than by new HTML attributes... > > Dan > -- -Thad Thad on Freebase.com <http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 15:48:19 UTC