- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:31:56 +0100
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Omar Benjelloun (عمر بنجلون) <benjello@google.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Ramanathan Guha <guha@google.com>
On 14 August 2013 16:47, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > Dan, > > Can you spell out exactly with an example, "what is appealing" ? Lost in translation I'm afraid. The idea is that we are mapping tabular grids into more explicitly descriptive structured data graphs. Some of these tables might be in HTML, but others will come from CSV or other RDBMS dumps. If we represent the information we need as an RDF vocabulary (e.g. schema.org extensions) then it will be equally applicable to any way of publishing/sharing such tables. If we represent it as new RDFa-like attributes, or new Microdata-like attributes, it will only work with tables written in that syntax. It is appealing to have a single approach work as far as possible with all table notations... Does that help? Dan
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 16:32:23 UTC