On 14 August 2013 16:17, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > Quick feedback Omar and others, > > <table typeof="Painting" vocab="http://schema.org/"> > > I would rather see "typeof" be renamed to "rowstypeof" or simply > "rowstype" to truly indicate that all the rows themselves have the implied > type and not the Table Set type or class. This way we can reserve the > Table "typeof" for higher kinded types, classes, and categories if need be ? > > My thinking and expression would look something like this : > > <table typeof="Artwork" rowstype="Painting" vocab="http://schema.org/"> > > cooler ideas also embedding the use of http://schema.org/Class : > > <table category="OnSale" class="Artwork" rowstype="Painting" vocab=" > http://schema.org/"> > > Thoughts ? > This would mean changes/additions to RDFa. And then we'd have to figure out the equivalent in JSON-LD, Microdata etc etc. So it is appealing to do the modeling as a pure vocabulary, rather than by new HTML attributes... Dan
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2013 15:39:24 UTC