Re: URIs for properties at schema.org

Bo,

Can you expand on what you mean here?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org> wrote:

> +1 for excluding the class domains in the URIs of multiple classes spanning
> properties, i.e., a name is a name is a name. [...]
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
>
> PS: otherwise we would probably end up with something the like the Freebase
> vocabulary ;)

i.e. What characteristic(s) of the Freebase vocabulary are you
referring to?  It looks to me like they've got the "name" property on
the "Object" type which is the most basic type.
http://www.freebase.com/schema/type/object

Tom