- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:44:16 +0200
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Hi, On 10/12/2011 9:45 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote: > Thanks for the pointer to any23.org <http://any23.org> > > An issue I clearly see with URIs such as http://schema.org/Person/name > is that some properties are used by more than one class. So we'll have > for example http://schema.org/Movie/duration and > http://schema.org/Event/duration potentially misleading to the idea that > they are different properties with specific domains, although the > definition found for "duration" is exactly the same at both > http://schema.org/Movie and http://schema.org/Event : "The duration of > the item (movie, audio recording, event, etc.) in ISO 8601 date format > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601>." So it's another argument for > having this definition clearly published at a single place, under > http://schema.org/duration - with expected range > http://www.schema.org/Duration. (which BTW would lead to the side issue > of having a property and its range just differing by one character case, > not a good practice in my opinion). +1 for excluding the class domains in the URIs of multiple classes spanning properties, i.e., a name is a name is a name. A human user and also a machine will get the relation (specific meaning) of name via its context, i.e., the types of that resource, e.g., schemaorg:Person => a person's name etc. Cheers, Bo PS: otherwise we would probably end up with something the like the Freebase vocabulary ;)
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 08:44:59 UTC