- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:20:52 +0200
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Hi Tom, On 10/12/2011 11:17 PM, Tom Morris wrote: > Bo, > > Can you expand on what you mean here? Let illustrate an example: In Freebase we have a type for describing music artists [1] and another type for describing music albums [2]. So far so good. However, both types include a property 'genre' for addressing the genres of a music artist respectively the genre of a music album. Unfortunately, this is not a shared property, i.e., there exist a separate genre property for music artists [3] and another for music albums [4]. Albeit, a genre relation is a genre relation is a genre relation, i.e., one single music genre relation with a union domain of music artist and music album (etc.) would be enough and reflects how a music genre property is defined and understood in reality. You could apply the same for repeating property definitions in the schema.org namespace. Cheers, Bo [1] http://www.freebase.com/schema/music/artist (http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/music.artist) [2] http://www.freebase.com/schema/music/album (http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/music.album) [3] http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/music.artist.genre [4] http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/music.album.genre
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 09:21:35 UTC