- From: Ian Davidson <ian@idatafy.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:20:12 -0600
- To: public-vc-edu@w3.org
- Cc: Kerri Lemoie <klemoie@mit.edu>, Nate Otto <nate@ottonomy.net>, "Phillip D. Long" <phil@rhzconsulting.com>, Kate Giovacchini <kate.giovacchini@asu.edu>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Taylor Kendal <taylor@learningeconomy.io>, chris purifoy <chris@learningeconomy.io>
- Message-ID: <CAAeZvPHjxAAZTegtP0aa0urmsd118L9NVt78Z8DerufnDYqQXA@mail.gmail.com>
Happy Holidays! I'm working on our annual LER Ecosystem report. Here is a link to last year's report <https://www.smartresume.com/resources/smartreport-ecosystem-map>. Through my research, I have been impressed with how far credential wallets have come in the last year and I'm hoping to help potential LER implementers better understand the different types of wallet use cases. We focus on the Learning and Employment Record ecosystem, not the wider Verifiable Credential or Credential Wallet ecosystem in this report. The report is about the issuance, sharing, and consumption of Open Badges and CLRs in the US only. I have chatted with several of you to help craft this suggested definition of credential management tools for our report. Kerri suggested I ping this group for further feedback. It's clearly tough to nail down an exact definition of a credential wallet while making sure to include all of the tools that help credential holders move their credentials through the LER ecosystem. Kate's suggestion was to call the category "Credential Management" and then have some of the sub-categories described as wallets. This is a moving target, but I'd appreciate any feedback you have on how to make this report as accurate as possible, while not over complicating things for our intended audience - those people who want to learn about and implement LERs! Let me know what you think over the next few days if you happen to be working. Thank you! Suggested language: Credential Management: Credential management tools provide a consumer application to store and share LER credentials. Consumers can aggregate their LER credentials in one place and share them from these tools with other applications or directly with other individuals. In our research, we found varying opinions on the term “credential wallet” which led us to broaden the category to focus on the tools individuals can use to manage their Open Badges and Comprehensive Learner Records and move them across the LER ecosystem. Credential management tools are evolving faster than other areas of the LER ecosystem. Here is how we see the segmentation of these tools at this moment in time: 1. Self-Sovereign Credential Wallets - These credential wallets embed credentials on a personal device and make them accessible without internet access, and they share and verify credentials using the W3C Verifiable Credentials standard. The wallet is detached from any credential-issuing platforms, is controlled by the user, and is available to the general public. Logos included: Learner Credential Wallet (from the Digital Credential ConsortiuM), Veres, LearnCard. 2. Branded Use-Case Wallets - These credential wallets focus on delivering a curated set of capabilities or user experiences designed to serve a specific audience of credential holders. They may be mobile-app or web-based but are always wrapped in a specific consumer brand and are designed to include or integrate a specific set of services on top of the storage of credentials. Logos included: ASU Pocket, Indiana Achievement Wallet, SchooLinks, State of California DMV Wallet, TBR Cred (from The College System of Tennessee), Western Governors University Achievement Wallet 3. White Label Wallet Tech Providers - These companies help consumer brands develop Branded Use-Case Wallets by providing the underlying technology, creating a branded instance of the wallet, and integrating or providing the desired value-added services. Logos included: Level Data, SpruceID, Pocket, iQ4, LearnCard 4. Issuer Platform Credential Management Tools - Many issuing platforms have credential-sharing tools embedded directly into the platform. These tools are web-based and do not meet the criteria of self-sovereign credential wallets. But they do allow credentials to be aggregated and moved into directly integrated websites and platforms like LinkedIn or Facebook where the credential may be shared as a link back to the issuing platform rather than as a fully portable asset. Logos included: Accredible, Instructure, Territorium, Credly, Greenlight Credentials Thank you! Ian -- Ian Davidson Chief Growth Officer, iDatafy 213.359.3109 ian@idatafy.com <dave@idatafy.com> SmartResume.com calendly.com/ian-idatafy
Attachments
- image/png attachment: rocketman22.png
Received on Monday, 30 December 2024 22:20:29 UTC