- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:35:38 -0800
- To: "Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)" <atsushi@w3.org>
- Cc: TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Hi Atsushi, My input below. > - I need to cite the resolution in transition request, could you write short email on that? See https://www.w3.org/2019/10/10-tt-minutes.html > - For outreach, short story is desired for FPWD release news. Could someone write one? Ok. When is the deadline? > - how about publication target date to Nov/14? Sounds good to me. > and we are about to merge #496 for finishing FPWD document. Please generate the FPWD from #496, but do not merge the branch. I will merge it after the FPWD is published. > - [ ] change date to target FPWD publication Done at #496 > - [ ] check remaining 'XXX' points Can you clarify what you mean? Best, -- Pierre On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:40 AM Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team) <atsushi@w3.org> wrote: > > hi Pierre, all, > > # starting taking over this... > > I think CfC period over (although resolution has not stated yet, neither in call minutes nor > email on mail list?), and we are about to merge #496 for finishing FPWD document. > > From process side, may I ask some in addition to these? > - I need to cite the resolution in transition request, could you write short email on that? > e.g. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-immersive-web-wg/2019Sep/0011.html > - For outreach, short story is desired for FPWD release news. Could someone write one? > e.g. https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/7951 > https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/09/json-ld-guiding-principles-first-public-working-draft/ > - how about publication target date to Nov/14? > - need to get transition request approved shortly > - publication work will be on Tue/Thu : https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2010JanMar/0037.html > > > Transition request draft is this, as already noted (no change). > https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/180 > > > -------- checklist at myside > - [x] spellcheck (nothing found) > - [x] metadata > - [x] link check > - [x] pubrules > - should be performed by respec but not pubrules checker (?) > - [ ] respec error > - should be fixed by #496 > - [ ] change date to target FPWD publication > - [ ] check remaining 'XXX' points > > > > On 2019/10/30 19:19, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: > > Hi Thierry, > > > > Quick clarification. > > > > The FPWD should simply be generated from [1]. > > > > I had mistakenly thought that [1] depended on [2]. This was not the > > case, and [2] was merged into the current editor's draft. > > > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496 > > [2] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/504 > > > > Best, > > > > -- Pierre > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:21 AM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux > > <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Thierry et al., > >> > >>> But there seem to be a Commit for "Correct HTTP reference" for which Pierre requested review from Ashimura and Nigel > >>> on October 10th days ago. I am not sure there is approval yet. > >> > >> The FPWD should be generated from: > >> > >> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496 > >> > >> after > >> > >> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/504 > >> > >> has been merged into it COB today (to satisfy the 14 day review period). > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> -- Pierre > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:49 AM Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Nigel, Atsushi and all, > >>> > >>> PlH asked me to look into the publication of IMSC1.2 FPWD > >>> > >>> I think this spec publication was discussed during the meeting at TPAC sept 18th , where unfortunately I could not participate. > >>> https://www.w3.org/2019/09/18-tt-minutes.html#x11 > >>> > >>> Therefore I have investigated into it: > >>> > >>> Looking at Github https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/485 > >>> there was a remaining issue about " Add support for #font using external resources". > >>> This issue was discussed during the sept 5th teleconference before following TPAC and is resolved. > >>> > >>> From what I remember from the following teleconferences I attended after TPAC, > >>> > >>> - this was first discussed during the 03 october telecon, > >>> https://www.w3.org/2019/10/03-tt-minutes.html#x08 > >>> which triggered a PR which was approved by Glenn and Nigel and PR was merged. > >>> > >>> at the end of this discussion there was a remaining issue about Vladimir to review this pull request. Did we receive any comment from him ? > >>> > >>> This FPWD publication was also discussed during the 10 october telecon, > >>> https://www.w3.org/2019/10/10-tt-minutes.html#x04 > >>> > >>> There was a resolution to publish IMSC1.2 as FPWD after a 10 working days period according to our Decision Policy, for consensus, starting on October 10th and ending Octobre 25th. > >>> > >>> Today, this period as ended and therefore I believe we can start the process of transition/publication request. > >>> > >>> The FPWD is available at > >>> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496 > >>> > >>> But there seem to be a Commit for "Correct HTTP reference" for which Pierre requested review from Ashimura and Nigel on October 10th days ago. I am not sure there is approval yet. > >>> > >>> Let me know. > >>> > >>> > >>> Nevertheless, I have requested Transition to the director. > >>> https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/180 > >>> > >>> But as Atsushi recommended, this Transition Request is on HOLD until we have a final Green light from the TTWG. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thierry > >>> > >>> > > >
Received on Friday, 8 November 2019 22:35:53 UTC