Re: FPWG for IMSC 1.2

Hi all,

Apologies my attention hasn't been on this as much as I'd like over the last week. Answers inline:

´╗┐On 08/11/2019, 22:36, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:

    Hi Atsushi,
    
    My input below.
    
    > - I need to cite the resolution in transition request, could you write short email on that?
    
    See https://www.w3.org/2019/10/10-tt-minutes.html


This is indeed the resolution to cite. In case there's any doubt, the decision review period expired with no objections, so the minuted resolution stands.
    
    > - For outreach, short story is desired for FPWD release news. Could someone write one?
    
    Ok. When is the deadline?

Apologies if you've already drafted something Pierre, but I'd say something like:

[[
This specification improves on [ttml-imsc1.1] by supporting contemporary practices, while retaining compatibility with [ttml-imsc1.1] documents. It provides one new feature, which permits external font files to be referenced explicitly. One existing feature has been clarified, and no features have been deprecated in this version.
]]
    
    > - how about publication target date to Nov/14?
    
    Sounds good to me.

Me too.
    
    > and we are about to merge #496 for finishing FPWD document.
    
    Please generate the FPWD from #496, but do not merge the branch. I
    will merge it after the FPWD is published.
    
    > - [ ] change date to target FPWD publication
    
    Done at #496
    
    > - [ ] check remaining 'XXX' points
    
    Can you clarify what you mean?
    
    Best,
    
    -- Pierre
    
    
    
    On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:40 AM Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team)
    <atsushi@w3.org> wrote:
    >
    >    hi Pierre, all,
    >
    > # starting taking over this...
    >
    >    I think CfC period over (although resolution has not stated yet, neither in call minutes nor
    > email on mail list?), and we are about to merge #496 for finishing FPWD document.
    >
    >    From process side, may I ask some in addition to these?
    > - I need to cite the resolution in transition request, could you write short email on that?
    >      e.g. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-immersive-web-wg/2019Sep/0011.html

    > - For outreach, short story is desired for FPWD release news. Could someone write one?
    >      e.g. https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/7951

    >           https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/09/json-ld-guiding-principles-first-public-working-draft/

    > - how about publication target date to Nov/14?
    >    - need to get transition request approved shortly
    >    - publication work will be on Tue/Thu : https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2010JanMar/0037.html

    >
    >
    >    Transition request draft is this, as already noted (no change).
    > https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/180

    >
    >
    > -------- checklist at myside
    > - [x] spellcheck (nothing found)
    > - [x] metadata
    > - [x] link check
    > - [x] pubrules
    >    - should be performed by respec but not pubrules checker (?)
    > - [ ] respec error
    >    - should be fixed by #496
    > - [ ] change date to target FPWD publication
    > - [ ] check remaining 'XXX' points
    >
    >
    >
    > On 2019/10/30 19:19, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
    > > Hi Thierry,
    > >
    > > Quick clarification.
    > >
    > > The FPWD should simply be generated from [1].
    > >
    > > I had mistakenly thought that [1] depended on [2]. This was not the
    > > case, and [2] was merged into the current editor's draft.
    > >
    > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496

    > > [2] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/504

    > >
    > > Best,
    > >
    > > -- Pierre
    > >
    > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:21 AM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
    > > <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> Hi Thierry et al.,
    > >>
    > >>> But there seem to be a Commit for "Correct HTTP reference"  for which Pierre requested review from Ashimura and Nigel
    > >>> on October 10th days ago. I am not sure there is  approval yet.
    > >>
    > >> The FPWD should be generated from:
    > >>
    > >> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496

    > >>
    > >> after
    > >>
    > >> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/504

    > >>
    > >> has been merged into it COB today (to satisfy the 14 day review period).
    > >>
    > >> Best,
    > >>
    > >> -- Pierre
    > >>
    > >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:49 AM Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>> Nigel, Atsushi and all,
    > >>>
    > >>> PlH asked me to look into the publication of IMSC1.2 FPWD
    > >>>
    > >>> I think this spec publication was discussed during the meeting at TPAC sept 18th , where unfortunately I could not participate.
    > >>> https://www.w3.org/2019/09/18-tt-minutes.html#x11

    > >>>
    > >>> Therefore I have investigated into it:
    > >>>
    > >>> Looking at Github https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/485

    > >>> there was a remaining issue about " Add support for #font using external resources".
    > >>> This issue was discussed during the sept 5th teleconference before following TPAC and is resolved.
    > >>>
    > >>>  From what I remember from the following teleconferences I attended after TPAC,
    > >>>
    > >>> - this was first discussed  during the 03 october telecon,
    > >>> https://www.w3.org/2019/10/03-tt-minutes.html#x08

    > >>> which triggered a PR which was approved by Glenn and Nigel and PR was merged.
    > >>>
    > >>> at the end of this discussion there was a remaining issue about Vladimir  to review this pull request. Did we receive any comment from him ?
    > >>>
    > >>> This FPWD publication was also discussed  during  the 10 october telecon,
    > >>> https://www.w3.org/2019/10/10-tt-minutes.html#x04

    > >>>
    > >>> There was a resolution to publish IMSC1.2 as FPWD after a 10 working days period according to our Decision Policy, for consensus, starting on October 10th and ending Octobre 25th.
    > >>>
    > >>> Today, this period as ended and therefore I believe we can start the process of transition/publication request.
    > >>>
    > >>> The FPWD is  available at
    > >>> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496

    > >>>
    > >>> But there seem to be a Commit for "Correct HTTP reference"  for which Pierre requested review from Ashimura and Nigel  on October 10th days ago. I am not sure there is  approval yet.
    > >>>
    > >>> Let me know.
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>> Nevertheless, I have requested Transition to the director.
    > >>> https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/180

    > >>>
    > >>> But as Atsushi recommended, this Transition Request is on HOLD until we have a final Green light from the TTWG.
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>> Thierry
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >
    >
    
    

Received on Monday, 11 November 2019 15:46:07 UTC