Re: FPWG for IMSC 1.2

   hi Pierre, all,

# starting taking over this...

   I think CfC period over (although resolution has not stated yet, neither in call minutes nor
email on mail list?), and we are about to merge #496 for finishing FPWD document.

   From process side, may I ask some in addition to these?
- I need to cite the resolution in transition request, could you write short email on that?
     e.g. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-immersive-web-wg/2019Sep/0011.html
- For outreach, short story is desired for FPWD release news. Could someone write one?
     e.g. https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/7951
          https://www.w3.org/blog/2018/09/json-ld-guiding-principles-first-public-working-draft/
- how about publication target date to Nov/14?
   - need to get transition request approved shortly
   - publication work will be on Tue/Thu : https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2010JanMar/0037.html


   Transition request draft is this, as already noted (no change).
https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/180


-------- checklist at myside
- [x] spellcheck (nothing found)
- [x] metadata
- [x] link check
- [x] pubrules
   - should be performed by respec but not pubrules checker (?)
- [ ] respec error
   - should be fixed by #496
- [ ] change date to target FPWD publication
- [ ] check remaining 'XXX' points



On 2019/10/30 19:19, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> Quick clarification.
> 
> The FPWD should simply be generated from [1].
> 
> I had mistakenly thought that [1] depended on [2]. This was not the
> case, and [2] was merged into the current editor's draft.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/504
> 
> Best,
> 
> -- Pierre
> 
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:21 AM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux
> <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Thierry et al.,
>>
>>> But there seem to be a Commit for "Correct HTTP reference"  for which Pierre requested review from Ashimura and Nigel
>>> on October 10th days ago. I am not sure there is  approval yet.
>>
>> The FPWD should be generated from:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496
>>
>> after
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/504
>>
>> has been merged into it COB today (to satisfy the 14 day review period).
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -- Pierre
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:49 AM Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nigel, Atsushi and all,
>>>
>>> PlH asked me to look into the publication of IMSC1.2 FPWD
>>>
>>> I think this spec publication was discussed during the meeting at TPAC sept 18th , where unfortunately I could not participate.
>>> https://www.w3.org/2019/09/18-tt-minutes.html#x11
>>>
>>> Therefore I have investigated into it:
>>>
>>> Looking at Github https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/485
>>> there was a remaining issue about " Add support for #font using external resources".
>>> This issue was discussed during the sept 5th teleconference before following TPAC and is resolved.
>>>
>>>  From what I remember from the following teleconferences I attended after TPAC,
>>>
>>> - this was first discussed  during the 03 october telecon,
>>> https://www.w3.org/2019/10/03-tt-minutes.html#x08
>>> which triggered a PR which was approved by Glenn and Nigel and PR was merged.
>>>
>>> at the end of this discussion there was a remaining issue about Vladimir  to review this pull request. Did we receive any comment from him ?
>>>
>>> This FPWD publication was also discussed  during  the 10 october telecon,
>>> https://www.w3.org/2019/10/10-tt-minutes.html#x04
>>>
>>> There was a resolution to publish IMSC1.2 as FPWD after a 10 working days period according to our Decision Policy, for consensus, starting on October 10th and ending Octobre 25th.
>>>
>>> Today, this period as ended and therefore I believe we can start the process of transition/publication request.
>>>
>>> The FPWD is  available at
>>> https://github.com/w3c/imsc/pull/496
>>>
>>> But there seem to be a Commit for "Correct HTTP reference"  for which Pierre requested review from Ashimura and Nigel  on October 10th days ago. I am not sure there is  approval yet.
>>>
>>> Let me know.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, I have requested Transition to the director.
>>> https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/180
>>>
>>> But as Atsushi recommended, this Transition Request is on HOLD until we have a final Green light from the TTWG.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>>
>>>
>

Received on Friday, 8 November 2019 10:40:05 UTC