- From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:17:18 +0100
- To: Glenn Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
- Cc: "public-tt@w3.org TTWG List" <public-tt@w3.org>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On 29 Jun 2009, at 09:14, Glenn Adams wrote: > the "(or transparency)" is obviously a parenthetical remark, and it > is obvious that the term transparency itself is not used in a > normative sense anywhere in the document, here it is an aid to the > reader The current text is: "The tts:opacity attribute is used to specify a style property that defines the opacity (or transparency) of..." I think that the following minor alteration removes the ambiguity due to the use of "or": "The tts:opacity attribute is used to specify a style property that defines the opacity (or conversely, the transparency) of..." This way, the mathematical relationship is immediately apparent and the reading flow is improved. To me anyway. Ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/ttaf1-dfxp/#style-attribute-opacity > and of course DFXP clearly marks normative vs informative sections, Yes, I scrolled-up to "2.3 Documentation Conventions" and found the explanation. Ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/ttaf1-dfxp/#conventions Regards, Daniel
Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 09:17:55 UTC