- From: Sean Hayes <shayes@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:34:42 +0100
- To: "Glenn A. Adams" <gadams@xfsi.com>
- Cc: <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2E8E7EA6DA6DF24F853D296CAB3BB31B01F8F37F@EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
I agree. However one can make reading somewhat more likely by not providing 'Cliffs notes' which you know are incomplete. ________________________________ From: Glenn A. Adams [mailto:gadams@xfsi.com] Sent: 29 March 2005 08:18 To: Sean Hayes Cc: public-tt@w3.org Subject: RE: Timed Text Authoring Format - Distribution Format Exchange Profile (DFXP) Streaming Unfortunately, one can't force careful reading. As one of my classics profs used to say: "Philology is the art of reading slowly". I'm afraid that reading specs necessarily falls under this rubric. ________________________________ From: Sean Hayes [mailto:shayes@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:02 AM To: Glenn A. Adams; Johnb@screen.subtitling.com Cc: public-tt@w3.org Subject: RE: Timed Text Authoring Format - Distribution Format Exchange Pr ofile (DFXP) Streaming Yes I understand that the spec is clear if you read it. My fear is that in the real world, people aren't going to read the small print (John has already demonstrated this :-) and really understand TT. They are going to load the XSD into XML Spy or some such tool and go generating thousands of document instances. If they are an influential player, and produce enough content then they become the de-facto standard. And we end up with another HTML situation. 'A stitch in time' as my Mother would say...
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 16:35:17 UTC