- From: Lee Tien <tien@eff.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:04:59 -0700
- To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Agree with Walter. That seems a no-brainer (to destroy accidentally collected data). Lee On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Walter van Holst wrote: > On 25/04/2014 23:53, Justin Brookman wrote: >> On the call last week, there did not appear to be any interest in >> revising the existing Editors' Draft Text on this issue: >> >> 8. Unknowing Collection >> >> If a party learns that it possesses data in violation of this >> recommendation, it must, where reasonably feasible, delete or >> de-identify that data at the earliest practical opportunity, even >> if it was previously unaware of such information practices despite >> reasonable efforts to understand its information practices. >> >> Jonathan Mayer had previously proposed language that was (arguably) >> more restrictive; however, no one spoke up to support that proposal >> (available >> here: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Unknowing). >> >> If no one wants to argue for this or a different change proposal, we >> will close this issue out in two weeks' time. > To be honest, I don't see any reason for the 'reasonably feasible' > qualifier. So I'm in favour of Jonathan's proposal or nothing at all, > since it is a no-brainer that if a party accidentally collects data, it > should destroy it as soon as possible. > > Regards, > > Walter > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 19:05:32 UTC