- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:07:14 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Bjoern, On Sunday 03 March 2013 02:48:47 Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > Clicking on a link on http://www.w3.org/ might take me to another page > but it's very unlikely that the click would take me to another > "party". On the homepage of www.w3.org alone there are: http://www.bisg.org/ http://idpf.org/ http://www.truststc.org/ http://www.yahoo.com/ http://webinos.org/ http://coremob.github.com/coremob-2012/FR- coremob-20130131.html#specifications-which-address-the-derived- requirements http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/ http://www.w3devcampus.com/ http://sxsw.com/interactive http://inova.snv.jussieu.fr/evenements/colloques/colloques/78_index_en.html http://www.slideshare.net/Yasodara http://www3.sp.senac.br/hotsites/wordpress/index.php/2013/02/15/road- show-ti-2013/ http://www2013.org/ http://www.multilingualweb.eu/en/documents/rome-workshop/rome-cfp http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/en/fokus_events/fame/mediawebsymposium2013/index.html http://www.la-grange.net/karl/ http://www.bertails.org/ http://twitter.com/W3C http://identi.ca/w3c Clicking on them takes you to another party. The Web 1.0 is all about jumping from one party to the other and not really realizing it.... So the Web is _very_ likely to take you to another party if you click. In fact, it was made precisely for that. I see your point, but here, it doesn't work, at least not with your arguments. --Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 21:07:42 UTC