- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:06:27 +0100
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
* Rigo Wenning wrote: >On Sunday 03 March 2013 02:48:47 Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> Clicking on a link on http://www.w3.org/ might take me to another page >> but it's very unlikely that the click would take me to another >> "party". > >On the homepage of www.w3.org alone there are: There are over 140 links on the page and among your 19 it seems unclear to me for a number of them whether they are actually another party, say >http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/ >http://www.w3devcampus.com/ These seem to be run by the W3C. >http://twitter.com/W3C >http://identi.ca/w3c And some Working Group members would consider these to be run by the W3C also. That leaves around 10%, and most of the links are in a small area that renders off-screen when you first load the page. Anyway... >Clicking on them takes you to another party. The Web 1.0 is all about >jumping from one party to the other and not really realizing it.... So >the Web is _very_ likely to take you to another party if you click. Let's say you are right, but the widget is such that clicking will not in fact take you to another party. Let's say a third party news widget shows a tabbed interface with tabs "World" and "Germany" and links to corresponding current news stories. "World" is the default and the user clicks "Germany". A third party blog comment widget has expand/collapse controls, and the user toggles one of those. A third party survey widget with a "show results" tab and the user clicks that tab. A third party search box that the user types in but then does not submit the query... Do you think the third party operating the widget should be elevated to first party status? I read the proposal as doing that because that's all more interaction than "merely mouses over, closes, or mutes" even though it does not meet the "reasonably conclude with high probability that the user intends to communicate with" definition for what is a first party. What if users learn that these kinds of interactions do not in fact take them to another party (or more reasonably, have learned that long ago)? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 23:06:54 UTC