- From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 05:45:21 -0700
- To: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 12:45:51 UTC
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Justin Brookman wrote: > This change is unnecessary. The standard already states that deidentified data is out of scope. > On re-read, it looks like the No Personalization section might only apply to permitted use data. In which case maybe it's redundant with the No Secondary Uses section? > This language (or at least concept) has long been stable in the document > I don't believe we ever reached consensus on whether DNT allows privacy-preserving personalization. > , and we shouldn't be challenging every uncontroversial wording decision at the 11th hour. > > From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] > > To: public-tracking@w3.org Group WG [mailto:public-tracking@w3.org] > > Sent: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 02:57:02 -0500 > > Subject: June Change Proposal: Personalization > > > > I would propose dropping section 5.1.3 ("No Personalization"). I would be comfortable allowing third parties to personalize a user's web experience… so long as it is done in a privacy-preserving way, with rigorously de-identified data. > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 12:45:51 UTC