Re: June Change Proposal: Personalization

This change is unnecessary.  The standard already states that deidentified data is out of scope.  This language (or at least concept) has long been stable in the document, and we shouldn't be challenging every uncontroversial wording decision at the 11th hour.
  _____  

From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu]
To: public-tracking@w3.org Group WG [mailto:public-tracking@w3.org]
Sent: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 02:57:02 -0500
Subject: June Change Proposal: Personalization

                  
                      I would propose dropping section 5.1.3 ("No Personalization").  I would be comfortable allowing third parties to personalize a user's web experience… so long as it is done in a privacy-preserving way, with rigorously de-identified data.