- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:20:50 +0200
- To: "Israel, Susan" <Susan_Israel@comcast.com>
- Cc: "'public-tracking@w3.org'" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "'rob@blaeu.com'" <rob@blaeu.com>, "'rweaver@comscore.com'" <rweaver@comscore.com>
Susan, will be mostly off until Friday, so I will look at the text on Friday.. --Rigo On Tuesday 18 June 2013 11:09:59 Israel, Susan wrote: > Some text is coming today. We will also run by jeff chester and justin > asap. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 04:12 AM > To: public-tracking@w3.org <public-tracking@w3.org>; Rob van Eijk > <rob@blaeu.com> Subject: Re: ACTION-415 Provide text proposal > regarding limitations on using a Potential Consent signal > > I will start to push again on audience measurement. I think audience > measurement should not be able to single out people and we should > require a minimum k-anonymity of categories. I'm still waiting for > text. I may write down my understanding at some point. > > Note that if I don't get text, they don't get a permitted use, so no > audience measurement.. So the incentives to provide text are clear. > > --Rigo > > On Saturday 15 June 2013 10:00:51 Rob van Eijk wrote: > > I remain very reserved on the P-flag as well. No new text on > > audience > > measurement has been presented to the group yet. In addition to > > that, > > and maybe even more important, the restriction to audience > > measurement must be normative in my view. There is only little > > negotiation room here, and creating a generic P-flag for possibly > > other uses than audience measurement is beyond that space for me.
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 11:21:22 UTC