Re: ACTION-415 Provide text proposal regarding limitations on using a Potential Consent signal

Susan, 

will be mostly off until Friday, so I will look at the text on Friday..

 --Rigo

On Tuesday 18 June 2013 11:09:59 Israel, Susan wrote:
> Some text is coming today. We will also run by jeff chester and justin
> asap.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 04:12 AM
> To: public-tracking@w3.org <public-tracking@w3.org>; Rob van Eijk
> <rob@blaeu.com> Subject: Re: ACTION-415 Provide text proposal
> regarding limitations on  using a Potential Consent signal
> 
> I will start to push again on audience measurement. I think audience
> measurement should not be able to single out people and we should
> require a minimum k-anonymity of categories. I'm still waiting for
> text. I may write down my understanding at some point.
> 
> Note that if I don't get text, they don't get a permitted use, so no
> audience measurement.. So the incentives to provide text are clear.
> 
>  --Rigo
> 
> On Saturday 15 June 2013 10:00:51 Rob van Eijk wrote:
> > I remain very reserved on the P-flag as well. No new text on
> > audience
> > measurement has been presented to the group yet. In addition to
> > that,
> > and maybe even more important, the restriction to audience
> > measurement must be normative in my view. There is only little
> > negotiation room here, and creating a generic P-flag for possibly
> > other uses than audience measurement is beyond that space for me.

Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 11:21:22 UTC