- From: Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:23:47 -0700
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "Israel, Susan" <Susan_Israel@comcast.com>
- CC: "'public-tracking@w3.org'" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "'rob@blaeu.com'" <rob@blaeu.com>, "'rweaver@comscore.com'" <rweaver@comscore.com>
Susan: Understanding that others may wish to have the chance to see text before it goes to the group, please strive to have text for everyone to see today, so we can know at least approximately where that stands going into this Wednesday's call. Thank you, Peter Prof. Peter P. Swire C. William O'Neill Professor of Law Ohio State University 240.994.4142 www.peterswire.net Beginning August 2013: Nancy J. and Lawrence P. Huang Professor Law and Ethics Program Scheller College of Business Georgia Institute of Technology -----Original Message----- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> Organization: W3C Date: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:20 AM To: "Israel, Susan" <Susan_Israel@comcast.com> Cc: "'public-tracking@w3.org'" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "'rob@blaeu.com'" <rob@blaeu.com>, "'rweaver@comscore.com'" <rweaver@comscore.com> Subject: Re: ACTION-415 Provide text proposal regarding limitations on using a Potential Consent signal Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org> Resent-Date: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:21 AM >Susan, > >will be mostly off until Friday, so I will look at the text on Friday.. > > --Rigo > >On Tuesday 18 June 2013 11:09:59 Israel, Susan wrote: >> Some text is coming today. We will also run by jeff chester and justin >> asap. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 04:12 AM >> To: public-tracking@w3.org <public-tracking@w3.org>; Rob van Eijk >> <rob@blaeu.com> Subject: Re: ACTION-415 Provide text proposal >> regarding limitations on using a Potential Consent signal >> >> I will start to push again on audience measurement. I think audience >> measurement should not be able to single out people and we should >> require a minimum k-anonymity of categories. I'm still waiting for >> text. I may write down my understanding at some point. >> >> Note that if I don't get text, they don't get a permitted use, so no >> audience measurement.. So the incentives to provide text are clear. >> >> --Rigo >> >> On Saturday 15 June 2013 10:00:51 Rob van Eijk wrote: >> > I remain very reserved on the P-flag as well. No new text on >> > audience >> > measurement has been presented to the group yet. In addition to >> > that, >> > and maybe even more important, the restriction to audience >> > measurement must be normative in my view. There is only little >> > negotiation room here, and creating a generic P-flag for possibly >> > other uses than audience measurement is beyond that space for me. >
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 11:24:18 UTC