- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:50:04 -0800
- To: Kevin Kiley <kevin.kiley@3pmobile.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-id: <8A3BCDA2-A1E5-4EF1-A06A-B6B3B7373B6A@apple.com>
yes, some minor editorial work is needed. I would also prefer to not casually split an infinitive. :-) On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:45 , Kevin Kiley <kevin.kiley@3pmobile.com> wrote: > > Should be 'utmost' instead of 'upmost' and I would drop the > possessive contraction and use 'it is' instead of it's. The contraction > doesn't make sense there amidst all the other exacting language. > > Kevin Kiley > > > Original posting… > > Hi Team, > > I would like to initiate a text change and close one issues that have > been pending review for a while. > If I do not receive objections/feedback, I would ask our editors to > perform the corresponding updates > and then close the corresponding issues. > > Regards, > matthias > > ----------- > ACTION-179: Draft section on seriousness of the request for a > user-granted exception (with ninja) > (http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/179) > (issue 129 is already closed). > I would like to add this non-normative text to the TPE spec: > "<Non-Normative> Requesting and having an exception granted by a user is > a significant event and should be treated as such. When requesting > site-wide or web-wide exceptions, the upmost care should be taken in > relaying to the user the breadth and expanse of the exception they are > granting. This is not to suggest the party requesting the exception > takes on direct liability for the parties the user is granting an > exception to but rather it's critical that requesters of user granted > exceptions take care to appropriately express the scope of that > exception such that liability is appropriately placed on the parties > benefiting from the exception." > > ----------------- > > ISSUE-138: Web-Wide Exception Well Known URI > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/138 > - Question was: What can third parties without JS real-estate do to > obtain an exception. > > Action 319 (http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/319) > David Singer has proposed this text: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Dec/0092.html > > I suggest to introduce this text into the spec and close Action-319 and > ISSUE-138 > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 17:50:57 UTC