- From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:26:24 +0000
- To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
HTTP://GIGAOM.COM/2013/12/11/ATTS-GIGABIT-SERVICE-IS-70-IF-YOU-LET-IT-SPY-ON-YOUR-SEARCHES/ -----Original Message----- From: Walter van Holst [mailto:walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 12:23 PM To: public-tracking@w3.org Subject: Re: Issue 153 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/12/2013 19:51, Shane M Wiley wrote: > That said, AT&T's new ad network that operates through deep-packet > inspection should be able to honor DNT requests generated at the > browser level. I am curious about this. Are there any public references on this? Regards, Walter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlKqDQEACgkQLgMH1kRJfHtofACgp6xwjaUy/igM1Uuj6F+Lyurz lw8AnRTwPVbnTzdL0PpIx8aY4k5feGt2 =P1Ay -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 19:27:44 UTC