- From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:24:36 +0100
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/12/2013 20:11, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: > There are two acceptable paths forward in my opinion: 1) The spec > txt remains as is, putting choice in the user's hands as to what > devices/software/etc they use for DNT 2) The spec remains silent on > anything but browsers, i.e. there is no blanket prohibition on > other approaches - the "we'll address that later" approach Either approach sounds sensible to me. With a preference for option 1. Regards, Walter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlKqDXQACgkQLgMH1kRJfHv9MgCeP5HR8oVLFG+l2LR+dPI9QPmn tzEAn0L5adNDmzReu/Q/wfvqphsxZsMt =pbgl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 19:25:05 UTC