Re: [Call for objections] Network interaction

Nick, Carl, Matthias,

The email below regarding ISSUE-217/ISSUE-228 clearly conflicts with the agenda sent by Matthias on December 3 that states:

ISSUES-217, -228 (definition of network interaction and user interaction) (Carl)
    December 04: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
    December 11: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus

According to the agenda, ISSUES-217, -228 are open for additional change proposals through tomorrow and the Call for Objections would not occur until December 11, a week from tomorrow.  Accordingly, the email sent below appears to have been sent prematurely.

Please confirm that the TPWG will follow the agenda for ISSUES-217, -228.

Best regards,


Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
Network Advertising Initiative | Counsel & Senior Director of Technology 
1634 Eye St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006
P: 202-347-5341 |

On Dec 2, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Nicholas Doty <> wrote:

> Hello WG,
> As discussed on the teleconference November 20th, we're issuing a Call for Objections on ISSUE-217/ISSUE-228 regarding the definition(s) of network interaction. If you have an objection to one or more of the proposed options, please describe your objection via this poll with clear and specific reasoning. The purpose of the poll is not to gather a count.
> The poll is already open, and will close on December 18th (slightly longer than usual duration given the holidays).
> Thanks,
> Nick (for Carl)
> (BCC public-tracking-announce for those not following public-tracking closely)

Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 16:09:57 UTC