- From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 21:56:36 -0000
- To: "'Aleecia M. McDonald'" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
- Cc: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Aleecia, I think that issue-64 needs to be thought about further. The only way that 1st party declared data can be used in a 3rd party context is if a UUID is stored (presumably in a cookie). 6.1.2.3 is therefore allowing UUIDs to be stored or used in order to track users irrespective of the DNT setting, which I cannot believe there is a consensus for. For starters it would not be legal in Europe (without some form of consent). Mike -----Original Message----- From: Aleecia M. McDonald [mailto:aleecia@aleecia.com] Sent: 09 November 2012 20:04 To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) (public-tracking@w3.org) Subject: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up Here are places we might have straight-forward decisions. If there are no responses within a week (that is, by Friday 16 November,) we will adopt the proposals below. For issue-97 (Re-direction, shortened URLs, click analytics -- what kind of tracking is this?) with action-196, we have text with no counter proposal. Unless someone volunteers to take an action to write opposing text, we will close this with the action-196 text. PROPOSED: We adopt the text from action-196, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Jun/0106.html For issue-60 (Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?) we had a meeting of the minds (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Apr/0129.html) but did not close the issue. We have support for 3.5.2 Option 2, http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#d ef-first-third-parties-opt-2, with one of the authors of 3.5.1 Option 1, http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#d ef-first-third-parties-opt-2 accepting Option 2. There was no sustained objection against Option 2 at that time. Let us find out if there is remaining disagreement. PROPOSED: We adopt 3.5.2 Option 2, http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#d ef-first-third-parties-opt-2 For action-306, we have a proposed definition with accompanying non-normative examples PROPOSED: We adopt the text from action-306 to define declared data, to be added to the definitions in the Compliance document, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Oct/0296.html PROPOSED: We look for volunteers to take an action to write text explaining when and how declared data is relevant (See the note in 6.1.2.3, http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#f irst-party-data) to address issue-64 Aleecia
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 21:57:18 UTC