W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > November 2012

Proposals for Compliance issue clean up

From: Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:04:28 -0800
Message-Id: <53EF2048-8E37-4502-AE5E-E956EE90FA1F@aleecia.com>
To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Here are places we might have straight-forward decisions. If there are no responses within a week (that is, by Friday 16 November,) we will adopt the proposals below. 

For issue-97 (Re-direction, shortened URLs, click analytics -- what kind of tracking is this?)  with action-196, we have text with no counter proposal. Unless someone volunteers to take an action to write opposing text, we will close this with the action-196 text.
	PROPOSED: We adopt the text from action-196, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Jun/0106.html

For issue-60 (Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?) we had a meeting of the minds (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Apr/0129.html) but did not close the issue. We have support for 3.5.2 Option 2, http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#def-first-third-parties-opt-2, with one of the authors of 3.5.1 Option 1, http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#def-first-third-parties-opt-2 accepting Option 2. There was no sustained objection against Option 2 at that time. Let us find out if there is remaining disagreement.
	PROPOSED: We adopt 3.5.2 Option 2, http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#def-first-third-parties-opt-2

For action-306, we have a proposed definition with accompanying non-normative examples
	PROPOSED: We adopt the text from action-306 to define declared data, to be added to the definitions in the Compliance document, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Oct/0296.html 
	PROPOSED: We look for volunteers to take an action to write text explaining when and how declared data is relevant (See the note in, http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#first-party-data) to address issue-64

Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 20:04:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:00 UTC