W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > May 2012

Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:20:22 +0200
To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: Kevin Smith <kevsmith@adobe.com>, Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6022724.ISbek4CCqA@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
On Thursday 03 May 2012 13:27:17 Shane Wiley wrote:
> Disagree on granularity.  If I say "the 3rd parties I work with = '*' "
> then it is defined and consent has been reached.

I also forgot to mention that in 5.2.2, a party can declare which other 
domains are "the same party". But at the same time, a party can not declare 
which are the third parties? Isn't this the same granularity? Wouldn't it be 
sufficient to count all the parties and declare the same parties and the 
other parties as for 5.2.2 a site would have to distinguish them anyway? 

Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 11:20:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:42 UTC