- From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:22:06 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
I expect that the guidance will be "MAY send response header" vs. "MUST" or "SHOULD". JC -----Original Message----- From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 12:18 PM To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] I hope so. Simple sites that do no tracking should be allowed to configure a static 'response' header, saying so, into their config files. On Dec 19, 2011, at 9:35 , Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/105 > > Raised by: Matthias Schunter > On product: Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) > > Should a site be required to send a response header even if no request header was received? > > [Spawned off ISSUE-51 during 2011-11-30 Telco] > > > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 01:22:55 UTC