RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

I agree with JC as we'll have publishers/web servers that will take time to upgrade to DNT support once the standard is out.  It'll take several years (if not longer if you look at the IE6 deprecation timeline) for all servers to get to a point where they can provide DNT Response Headers.  I would assume if a server does not provide a response header it does not support DNT (either technical or by policy).

- Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: JC Cannon [mailto:jccannon@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 6:22 PM
To: David Singer; Tracking Protection Working Group WG
Subject: RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

I expect that the guidance will be "MAY send response header" vs. "MUST" or "SHOULD".

JC

-----Original Message-----
From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 12:18 PM
To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG
Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

I hope so.  Simple sites that do no tracking should be allowed to configure a static 'response' header, saying so, into their config files.


On Dec 19, 2011, at 9:35 , Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> 
> tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header?  [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/105
> 
> Raised by: Matthias Schunter
> On product: Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
> 
> Should a site be required to send a response header even if no request header was received?
> 
> [Spawned off ISSUE-51 during 2011-11-30 Telco]
> 
> 
> 

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 01:26:56 UTC