Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

On Dec 19, 2011, at 17:22 , JC Cannon wrote:

> I expect that the guidance will be "MAY send response header" vs. "MUST" or "SHOULD".

sorry, yes, not required

> 
> JC
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 12:18 PM
> To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG
> Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
> 
> I hope so.  Simple sites that do no tracking should be allowed to configure a static 'response' header, saying so, into their config files.
> 
> 
> On Dec 19, 2011, at 9:35 , Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
>> 
>> tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header?  [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/105
>> 
>> Raised by: Matthias Schunter
>> On product: Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
>> 
>> Should a site be required to send a response header even if no request header was received?
>> 
>> [Spawned off ISSUE-51 during 2011-11-30 Telco]
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 18:05:49 UTC