- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:04:50 -0800
- To: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Dec 19, 2011, at 17:22 , JC Cannon wrote: > I expect that the guidance will be "MAY send response header" vs. "MUST" or "SHOULD". sorry, yes, not required > > JC > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 12:18 PM > To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG > Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] > > I hope so. Simple sites that do no tracking should be allowed to configure a static 'response' header, saying so, into their config files. > > > On Dec 19, 2011, at 9:35 , Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> >> tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/105 >> >> Raised by: Matthias Schunter >> On product: Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) >> >> Should a site be required to send a response header even if no request header was received? >> >> [Spawned off ISSUE-51 during 2011-11-30 Telco] >> >> >> > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > > > > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 18:05:49 UTC