- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 23:41:05 +0000
- To: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
- CC: "public-touchevents@w3.org" <public-touchevents@w3.org>
On 04/12/2014 21:55, Rick Byers wrote: > Sounds reasonable. Maybe "with" is clearer than "including"? +1 > This might technically be considered a change in semantics though. Is > there anything elsewhere in the spec that would have prohibited an > implementation from (for example) making all such co-ordinates 0? I would argue that it's already implied that implementations should be doing it the way I'd like to see clarified. "must be a list of touch points", and touch point being defined as "the coordinate point..." http://www.w3.org/TR/touch-events/#dfn-touch-point it would take a rather obtuse reading of the spec to decide to just pass nonsensical coordinates (not to say that implementers are never nonsensical or obtuse, mind ;) ) P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 23:41:28 UTC