Re: Errata for Touch Events: 5.1 Attributes - expanding changedTouches explanation

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 04/12/2014 21:55, Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> Sounds reasonable.  Maybe "with" is clearer than "including"?
>>
>
> +1
>
>  This might technically be considered a change in semantics though.  Is
>> there anything elsewhere in the spec that would have prohibited an
>> implementation from (for example) making all such co-ordinates 0?
>>
>
> I would argue that it's already implied that implementations should be
> doing it the way I'd like to see clarified. "must be a list of touch
> points", and touch point being defined as "the coordinate point..."
> http://www.w3.org/TR/touch-events/#dfn-touch-point it would take a rather
> obtuse reading of the spec to decide to just pass nonsensical coordinates
> (not to say that implementers are never nonsensical or obtuse, mind ;) )


You've convinced me!


> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>