Re: Errata for Touch Events?

On 04/12/2014 21:59, Rick Byers wrote:
> Better (very) late than never.  I think I finally replied to all of your
> comments - so sorry for taking so long.  This is important to me, I'll
> be more responsive in the future (this all just came at a really bad
> time for me where I was totally overloaded).

No worries. I was just trying to understand if we needed some further 
bureaucratic steps or not.

> Anything else I need to do to move this forward?

My only outstanding quibble is with the note in the introduction

"The W3C's Protocols and Formats Working Group created a non-normative 
document that includes a mapping of hardware events (e.g. keyboard 
events) to touch events. For more information see Touch Events 
Accessibility Mapping."

I've reached out to the PFWG - my first attempt of just sending my query 
to their public mailing list failed, as paradoxically it's called 
"public" but only members are allowed to post - but I then asked some of 
my colleagues who are part of the WG to pass the query on on my behalf - 
and yet, I have heard very little back, apart from a suggestion from one 
of the WG members to use my test results from 
http://patrickhlauke.github.io/touch/tests/results/ somehow instead.

I responded that I didn't mind my work being used (with a tiny credit) 
by the PFWG, but if alternatively we should host some form of 
mapping/results (based on my stuff) on the CG wiki, and what sort of 
legal conundrums that may bring up (TE errata pointing to a CG wiki). 
Thoughts?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 23:48:05 UTC