Re: Errata for Touch Events: 5.1 Attributes - expanding changedTouches explanation

Sounds reasonable.  Maybe "with" is clearer than "including"?

This might technically be considered a change in semantics though.  Is
there anything elsewhere in the spec that would have prohibited an
implementation from (for example) making all such co-ordinates 0?

Rick

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> In the current changedTouches description, the last sentence reads
>
> "For the touchend and touchcancel events this must be a list of the touch
> points that have just been removed from the surface."
>
> Wonder if this could be expanded to clarify:
>
> "For the touchend and touchcancel events this must be a list of the touch
> points that have just been removed from the surface, including the last
> known coordinates of the touch points before they were removed." or similar.
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>