- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:39:51 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABirCh-TP=W2zynWzK99mWckFy2s89jKzW9uJtpbFrQ0+KuUzg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > I do not understand how you come to such a conclusion. On the contrary, I > find that the Web authoring community has done a remarkable job of > disseminating exactly this kind of information. > If it's going to take evangelism to correct this problem, then it's much better to avoid it to begin with. I also disagree that there's any particular reason to believe that people > will be less likely to use <br> incorrectly than real line breaks. > Certainly Web authors seem quite happy to use <br> incorrectly in Web > markup often enough. > It's rare in my experience to see paragraphs manually word-wrapped with <br>s on the Web; people generally understand that in HTML, word-wrapping is done by the browser and not by the author. > With explicit line breaks, it'll be much more obvious to people that > > wrapping works like HTML and not like text/plain. > > With explicit line breaks, it'll be much uglier. > The one in a few thousand captions that need an explicit line break for some reason will have a <br>. That's not ugly. It's also an improvement to the format by itself; it's convenient to break longer captions in text editors, and it makes accidental line breaks less likely. > It's fairly uncommon to actually want a line break inside a caption, so > > the cost to users of having to say <br> is trivially small. > > I disagree with this premise. Lots of subtitles consist of dialogue of the > form: > > - You ready, Corporal? > - Yes, ma'am. > These are two one-line captions, not one two-line caption. -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 22:40:19 UTC