- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:54:07 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > > I do not understand how you come to such a conclusion. On the > > contrary, I find that the Web authoring community has done a > > remarkable job of disseminating exactly this kind of information. > > If it's going to take evangelism to correct this problem, then it's much > better to avoid it to begin with. I do not believe that it will. Mere tutorial-level information will be sufficient for this kind of thing. That is, whatever mechanism people use to learn the language will be fine. > > I also disagree that there's any particular reason to believe that > > people will be less likely to use <br> incorrectly than real line > > breaks. Certainly Web authors seem quite happy to use <br> incorrectly > > in Web markup often enough. > > It's rare in my experience to see paragraphs manually word-wrapped with > <br>s on the Web; people generally understand that in HTML, > word-wrapping is done by the browser and not by the author. Your experiences have clearly been more positive than mine. > > > With explicit line breaks, it'll be much more obvious to people that > > > wrapping works like HTML and not like text/plain. > > > > With explicit line breaks, it'll be much uglier. > > The one in a few thousand captions that need an explicit line break for > some reason will have a <br>. That's not ugly. It's not one in a few thousand. > It's also an improvement to the format by itself; it's convenient to > break longer captions in text editors, and it makes accidental line > breaks less likely. We're talking about captions. Long captions so long that they won't fit on one line of an editor are exceedingly rare. > > I disagree with this premise. Lots of subtitles consist of dialogue of > > the form: > > > > - You ready, Corporal? > > - Yes, ma'am. > > These are two one-line captions, not one two-line caption. The specific example above is a single bitmap from a DVD caption track. (First hit on Google for that cue's text identifies the source correctly. It happened to be what I had playing -- with captions enabled, coincidentally -- when I replied to the earlier e-mail.) I see no reason to suggest that authors should use two WebVTT cues for such a case. On the contrary, I think such cases are quite common. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 22:54:32 UTC