- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:29:47 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > I've explained the problem. Again, it will cause most ex-SRT users to > mistakenly manually wrap lines, which will result in a much higher > percentage of low-quality, hard-wrapped content that will fall apart if > the user selects a larger font size. I do not think the majority of future WebVTT authors are going to be SRT users. That would be like optimising HTML for SGML users. > People are never going to understand that wrapping in VTT should be left > to the renderer, and not done by hand like in SRT, unless this is fixed. I do not understand how you come to such a conclusion. On the contrary, I find that the Web authoring community has done a remarkable job of disseminating exactly this kind of information. I also disagree that there's any particular reason to believe that people will be less likely to use <br> incorrectly than real line breaks. Certainly Web authors seem quite happy to use <br> incorrectly in Web markup often enough. > With explicit line breaks, it'll be much more obvious to people that > wrapping works like HTML and not like text/plain. With explicit line breaks, it'll be much uglier. It's pretty obvious that line wrapping happens, you'll notice it as soon as you write a long line, which is likely to happen pretty early on. This is especially true for Web formats, where differing line lengths will be widely seen. > It's fairly uncommon to actually want a line break inside a caption, so > the cost to users of having to say <br> is trivially small. I disagree with this premise. Lots of subtitles consist of dialogue of the form: - You ready, Corporal? - Yes, ma'am. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 03:30:13 UTC