- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:51:35 +0000
- To: public-test-infra@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14882
fd <fd@w3.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fd@w3.org
--- Comment #7 from fd <fd@w3.org> 2011-11-22 14:51:35 UTC ---
I confirm.
Actually, whether an <object> or an <iframe> gets used doesn't make a
difference in terms of scrolling in typical mobile browsers on touchscreens:
they don't allow users to scroll embedded contents. Scrolling only works for
the whole page.
The difference between <object> and <iframe> is that these mobile browsers will
automatically adjust the size of an <iframe> to fit that of the content it
contains. They won't do so with <object> meaning that, no matter what value of
"overflow" you may set, the embedded content is likely to appear truncated on
mobile browsers.
I don't think there is any drawback in using an <iframe> instead of an <object>
to embed content.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 14:51:40 UTC