- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:42:43 +0200
- To: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- CC: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On 04/11/2011 01:32 AM, Garrett Smith wrote: > On 4/10/11, James Graham<jgraham@opera.com> wrote: >>> And again, a test that does that is a mistake. Quite obvious. >> >> How would you write a test that a structured clone correctly preserves >> NaN values? >> > If needed, I would be including to write an > `assert_object_equivalence`. In my style, that'd be more like: I don't see that having assert_equals and assert_object_equivalence that do similar, but slightly different, things is at all clearer than having a single method that has the useful behaviour from both. Apart from the NaN case how would you expect these two methods to differ?
Received on Monday, 11 April 2011 13:43:18 UTC