Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process

On 4/10/11, James Graham <> wrote:

>> Just delete it.
> Just delete what?
The code that handles the NaN case inside of assert_equals.


>> And again, a test that does that is a mistake. Quite obvious.
> How would you write a test that a structured clone correctly preserves
> NaN values?
If needed, I would be including to write an
`assert_object_equivalence`. In my style, that'd be more like:

TestRunner.assert( objectsAreEquivalent(actual, expected) );

Received on Sunday, 10 April 2011 23:32:39 UTC